Back to Faculty Search
Muhammad Sadiq Amin - NUST SEECS Professor

Muhammad Sadiq Amin

SEECS

3.4 / 5.0(9 reviews)

Please sign in to leave a review

Reviews

Anonymous

14 hours ago

Literally the worst teacher I've ever had. Extremely pathetic teaching and the attitude don't even get me started on that.

Anonymous

3 weeks ago

Stays stuck on some topics for weeks and then speed runs the rest of syllabus. An average teacher at best. Exams are relatively easy

Anonymous

2 months ago

Extremely moody person gives poor grades and favours some students in class only give them good grades poor communication skills and poor concepts all codes written in slides are of gpt and sometimes he gives full marks on wrong code and sometimes 0 marks on code with 0 errors idk why seecs has appointed such person

Anonymous

4 months ago

Very cooperative teacher. Paper is quite easy. Study from slides with help of gpt ..baqi ezy scene ha

Anonymous

4 months ago

the best teacher I've had so far extremely friendly and always there to help just like a friend who supports us in both in our university life and outside of it always available to help acting as a mentor

Anonymous

4 months ago

Very humble and cooperative faculty of nust. Sometimes paper is very easy and sometimes paper is very tricky but marking criteria is fair

Anonymous

4 months ago

Sir sadiq is truly supportive, patient, and encourage students to participate actively in class. I truly appreciate their dedication, professionalism, and positive attitude toward students’ success. He maintains a friendly and approachable relationship with students, which motivates and encourages them to participate and learn confidently.

Anonymous

5 months ago

goat teacher, teach really well but very slow like on one topic he could spend one month , but exam very easy mid and final and easy grading

Anonymous

8 months ago

very very moody. picks out a few people from the class and points them out in every lecture. extremely easy exams, but will give a zero if you make a single mistake.